Well I can only hope that Judge Olds had a great holiday with her family, meaning sister, mom, dad, and others family member, as for Ican tell she has no kids of her own, which I think is a great thing.
I do monthly search on those involve in my cases, to see if anyone else is having problems with them, and so.
Well I can't believe this Judge has a Twitter account. private of course i wonder what she has to hide..
However this post just isn't about how she is a inept judge.
here are some things about a fellowjudge in the same courthouse.. whom I had as well
JUDGE EILEEN ANITA OLDS
Chesapeake JDR
Judge Olds doesn't listen, doesn't even follow her own orders, try to make new law from the bench, In one breath she made an order then with another breath she counter the order. She is the first female judge in Chesapeake, and it has gone to her head. Also note that if she order you to do something which she doesn't have the power to enforce that order will get lost from your court file, so get a copy asap Do not go into her courtroom with an lawyer, and if you really want her to do her job also hired a court Stenographer to record your hearing, you have this right in VA, However JDR will not give you any names of these people
JUDGE LARRY WILLIS
Chesapeake, VA
don’t know if he’s pissed at being repeatedly passed over for Circuit Court or if he’s been passed over because he’s just an idiot. I’ve actually seen this man asleep during a trial. He doesn’t listen to the testimony and makes up his decisions as he goes along. Let’s hope that when he leaves the JDR, he doesn't go any higher.
This is my case in Chesapeake JDR court and other items in and around Chesapeake VA
When police or prosecutors conceal significant exculpatory or impeaching material, we hold, it is ordinarily incumbent on the state to set the record straight. - Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Showing posts with label Judges. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judges. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Saturday, August 16, 2008
COURTS NOT OF RECORD: JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS DISTRICT COURTS.
02-046
COURTS NOT OF RECORD: JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS DISTRICT COURTS.
Juvenile court has no authority to appoint counsel for child who is subject of abuse and neglect, entrustment agreement, or petition for termination of residual parental rights, but must appoint guardian ad litem for such child.
Juvenile court has no authority to appoint guardian ad litem for juvenile defendant, in addition to appointment of legal counsel, to represent child in delinquency, child in need of services, or child in need of supervision proceeding.
Juvenile court has no authority to appoint guardian ad litem, in addition to appointment of legal counsel, to represent parent, guardian or other adult charged with abuse or neglect of child or parent or guardian who would be subjected to loss of residual parental rights.
In cases other than abuse and neglect, entrustment agreements, termination of parental rights, delinquency, or child in need of services or supervision, juvenile court may appoint either counsel or guardian ad litem, but not both.
click here to read more, also if you can't find the pdf let me know I have a copy..
COURTS NOT OF RECORD: JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS DISTRICT COURTS.
Juvenile court has no authority to appoint counsel for child who is subject of abuse and neglect, entrustment agreement, or petition for termination of residual parental rights, but must appoint guardian ad litem for such child.
Juvenile court has no authority to appoint guardian ad litem for juvenile defendant, in addition to appointment of legal counsel, to represent child in delinquency, child in need of services, or child in need of supervision proceeding.
Juvenile court has no authority to appoint guardian ad litem, in addition to appointment of legal counsel, to represent parent, guardian or other adult charged with abuse or neglect of child or parent or guardian who would be subjected to loss of residual parental rights.
In cases other than abuse and neglect, entrustment agreements, termination of parental rights, delinquency, or child in need of services or supervision, juvenile court may appoint either counsel or guardian ad litem, but not both.
click here to read more, also if you can't find the pdf let me know I have a copy..
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Suit greenlighted by appeal wraps up with settlement
Ryan Taboada and his family checked into a Roanoke hotel on March 27, 2003. When he went outside to get his luggage, a man shot him eight times and stole his van with his 3-year-old daughter still inside.
This week, a Roanoke judge signed an order dismissing the $3 million lawsuit Taboada filed against the owners of Holiday Inn Express on Gainsboro Road, saying the two sides "have compromised and settled their differences."
In between came a decision by the Supreme Court of Virginia that changed the law governing the obligations of innkeepers to their guests.
Alan Gnapp, lawyer for Daly Seven Inc., the company that owns the hotel, declined to comment about the settlement, as did Taboada's lawyer, S.D. Roberts "Rabbit" Moore.
But Richard Samet, a Richmond defense lawyer who has written a legal article on the Taboada case, said the state supreme court decision so broadened the liability of innkeepers that "I don't see how it could not have had an effect on the mediation and settlement of the case."
Virginia Beach lawyer and legal expert Steven Emmert suggested that the high court's precedent-setting decision could have been influenced by the egregiousness of what happened to Taboada. "It was a horrifying situation," he said.
A Florida businessman, Taboada and his family were in town visiting a cousin. When Derrick W. Smith sprayed him with gunfire, it left him temporarily paralyzed, with two collapsed lungs. His daughter was rescued minutes later unharmed after Smith wrecked while being chased by police.
In his lawsuit against the hotel, filed before Smith received a 76-year prison sentence, Taboada accused Daly Seven of cutting back on security at the hotel despite knowing that it operated in a high-crime area and that guests could be in danger of assault.
Daly Seven argued that the company couldn't be held liable because there was no way for the hotel to know Taboada was going to be attacked, and Roanoke Circuit Court Judge Clifford Weckstein agreed.
Taboada appealed, and in 2006 the Virginia Supreme Court unanimously overturned Weckstein's decision, saying Taboada's lawsuit could go forward. The justices ruled that an innkeeper has a duty to protect the safety of guests akin to that of trains and airplanes toward their passengers, and that Daly Seven should have known Taboada could be in danger because of the number of crimes and incidents that had already taken place on the property.
The Judges in VA are running amuck, I tell you these fucking judges are only looking after themselves. That is why we need to judicial reform in VA. All Judges should be elected, not appointed by their friends in the Legislator. What will be and who will be next to be abuse by these fucking assholes.
Saturday, March 22, 2008
She is back in the News

look at her, she think she all that. mmm never married no kids, mmmm I wonder why?????????????????

Can we said

Monday, February 18, 2008
From another source
HAMPTON ROADS, VIRGINIA - An illegal immigrant was sentenced to a year in prison on Monday for having sex with a 13-year-old girl and producing nude images of the child.
[Feel free to send this sorry-ass judge an email at epgrissom@worldnet.att.net]
Carlos De La Cruz Ramos, formerly of the 3700 block of S. Military Hwy. in Chesapeake, was arrested in May after a Wal-Mart store clerk processed film he had dropped off that showed images of a nude child, police said. Ramos was convicted in August of producing child pornography and carnal knowledge, both felonies carrying maximum punishments of 10 years in prison.
Read The Full Article
I was once in front of this damn ass myself, he is nolonger on the brench, yes the old fucker retired...
[Feel free to send this sorry-ass judge an email at epgrissom@worldnet.att.net]
Carlos De La Cruz Ramos, formerly of the 3700 block of S. Military Hwy. in Chesapeake, was arrested in May after a Wal-Mart store clerk processed film he had dropped off that showed images of a nude child, police said. Ramos was convicted in August of producing child pornography and carnal knowledge, both felonies carrying maximum punishments of 10 years in prison.
Read The Full Article
I was once in front of this damn ass myself, he is nolonger on the brench, yes the old fucker retired...
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
An Update to a another Post
I forgot to mention that Her Lawyer Heather B Crook, also want the judge to rewrite federal laws. She wanted to the judge to order that I couldn't sell or transfer my income from my mother death unless it was to my son. I told her in court that if was to die that minute he still won't get it. You may be asking why. Yes, He is my next of kin. But that income was from the death of my father. The Settlement called for it to go to his next of kin, My sister and I. If either one of us die and we don't have a will it goes to the last survivor living that was named in the court settlement papers.
I know this because it took us almost a year to find the settlement that was filed with the courts.
I know this because it took us almost a year to find the settlement that was filed with the courts.
Saturday, February 17, 2007
Politics' role in selecting judges condemned, defended
Virginia remains the only state in the nation in which the legislature - specifically the majority party - wields all the power in the judicial selection process.
That has made appointing judges a perk and an opportunity for patronage.
According to state campaign finance records, some judges appointed to the local trial courts - or their family members - made hefty campaign contributions to the legislators who picked them. Most donations occurred in the years just prior to their nominations.
(Read Entire Story)
Thursday, April 27, 2006
Looking Thru Past Files
I was looking through my case files today, and found a few things that I feel I need to share.
This is one of the road blocks that the JDR Court set in front of me.
Order was in Chesapeake JDR Court date 2-14-03.
The Following Parties where Present.
Petitioner/ on her attorney
Respondent
Type of case. Custody
Finding of the Courts:
"There is a NC Custody in effect, hearing pending in NC 3-6-03.
Atty D. Dickerson appt. GAL, he is to facilitate visitation."
case to cont'd. 3-21-03."
I did comply this time, the first time I refuse to comply. I inform Judge Olds that I would not since there was not grounds for such test under VA Law. She didn't push the issue.
The Courts received the test result via cert. Mail. In court the clerk claims that I didn't send the information till I present the returned receipt from my Cert. Mail to the court.
I took the class but she didn't.
Judge olds over look it, however she didn't show for court that day, yet (if I'm correct she didn't show for court) Only her lawyer.
She how the court treats fathers from the way they treat mother. Its like one law rich and one law for the poor or in this case one for mothers and one for fathers.
I SAY ITS TIME TO OPEN THE FAMILY COURTS TO THE PUBLIC AND HAVE EACH CASE RECORDED. HAVE THE JUDGES TERMS CUT 2 TERM IN OFFICE THEN BACK TO PRIVATE SECTOR FOR AT LEAST ONE TERM. BEFORE THEY ARE APPOINTED BACK TO FAMILY COURT
This is one of the road blocks that the JDR Court set in front of me.
Order was in Chesapeake JDR Court date 2-14-03.
The Following Parties where Present.
Petitioner/ on her attorney
Respondent
Type of case. Custody
Finding of the Courts:
"There is a NC Custody in effect, hearing pending in NC 3-6-03.
Atty D. Dickerson appt. GAL, he is to facilitate visitation."
It is ordered that (f) father ordered per order 12-1-97 order to provide proof
of HIV testing under seal by 3-20-03. (M) mother does not need to be back it (F)
has not provided test result by 3-20-03. (M) (F) order to complete parenting
classes.
case to cont'd. 3-21-03."
I did comply this time, the first time I refuse to comply. I inform Judge Olds that I would not since there was not grounds for such test under VA Law. She didn't push the issue.
The Courts received the test result via cert. Mail. In court the clerk claims that I didn't send the information till I present the returned receipt from my Cert. Mail to the court.
I took the class but she didn't.
Judge olds over look it, however she didn't show for court that day, yet (if I'm correct she didn't show for court) Only her lawyer.
She how the court treats fathers from the way they treat mother. Its like one law rich and one law for the poor or in this case one for mothers and one for fathers.
I SAY ITS TIME TO OPEN THE FAMILY COURTS TO THE PUBLIC AND HAVE EACH CASE RECORDED. HAVE THE JUDGES TERMS CUT 2 TERM IN OFFICE THEN BACK TO PRIVATE SECTOR FOR AT LEAST ONE TERM. BEFORE THEY ARE APPOINTED BACK TO FAMILY COURT
Monday, November 21, 2005
If anyone has a case in Chesapeake JDR
IF ANYONE EVER HAS A CASE IN THE CHESAPEAKE JDR COURT IN CHESAPEAKE BE FORE WARN THAT YOUR CIVIL RIGHTS WILL BE VIOLATED.
Judges
Hon. Rufus A. Banks Jr.~*
Hon. Eileen Anita Olds~
Hon. Larry D. Willis~
* Chief Judge ~ Presiding Judge
JUDGE OLDS IS MOSTLY PRO-WOMAN, PRO-MOTHERS,,, JUDGE WILLIS JUST DOES WHAT HE WANTS. HE THINKS HE IS THE LAW IN THE HIS COURT ROOM. JUDGE BANKS. I WOULD HAVE TO WONDER ABOUT HIS STATUS. I ONLY BE IN FRONT OF HIM ONCE AND I THINK HE MIGHT HAVE ONE TOO MANY IN THE MORNING. ALL OF THESE JUDGES HAVE BEEN AT LEAST ONCE CHEIF JUDGE OF THIS COURT.
TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS HIRE A COURT REPORTER FOR YOUR CASE, THE JUDGES CAN'T STOP YOU FROM DOING THIS.
THE CLERK
Clerk
Ms Lorraine Creef Throckmorton, NEW TO THE COURT HOUSE. IT WOULD SEEN THAT A FEW YEARS A MAJOR HOUSE CLEANING WAS DONE IN THIS COURT HOUSE, MOST OF ALL THE CLERKS WERE REPLACE WITH COMPLETE ASSHOLES WHO COULDN'T FIND THEIR WAY TO THE RESTROOM WITH A MAP.
Judges
Hon. Rufus A. Banks Jr.~*
Hon. Eileen Anita Olds~
Hon. Larry D. Willis~
* Chief Judge ~ Presiding Judge
JUDGE OLDS IS MOSTLY PRO-WOMAN, PRO-MOTHERS,,, JUDGE WILLIS JUST DOES WHAT HE WANTS. HE THINKS HE IS THE LAW IN THE HIS COURT ROOM. JUDGE BANKS. I WOULD HAVE TO WONDER ABOUT HIS STATUS. I ONLY BE IN FRONT OF HIM ONCE AND I THINK HE MIGHT HAVE ONE TOO MANY IN THE MORNING. ALL OF THESE JUDGES HAVE BEEN AT LEAST ONCE CHEIF JUDGE OF THIS COURT.
TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS HIRE A COURT REPORTER FOR YOUR CASE, THE JUDGES CAN'T STOP YOU FROM DOING THIS.
THE CLERK
Clerk
Ms Lorraine Creef Throckmorton, NEW TO THE COURT HOUSE. IT WOULD SEEN THAT A FEW YEARS A MAJOR HOUSE CLEANING WAS DONE IN THIS COURT HOUSE, MOST OF ALL THE CLERKS WERE REPLACE WITH COMPLETE ASSHOLES WHO COULDN'T FIND THEIR WAY TO THE RESTROOM WITH A MAP.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)