That Damn Fake -Str8 Lesbain is at it again

This Sick bitch is at it again, she has a child with her lover, then wants out, but knows if she stay in VT, she would a have share custody with her partner, so what does she do, she runs her fake str8 ass to Virginia, claims to be straight again and hope to use VA's anti-gays laws in her favor. This is really sick.

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) – A Virginia woman is continuing her lengthy battle to deny child-visitation rights to her former lesbian partner. 

 

In a brief filed March 3 with the Virginia Court of Appeals, Lisa Miller’s attorneys argue that state law bars the enforcement of a Vermont court order awarding Janet Jenkins visitation rights for 6-year-old Isabella.

Miller’s lawyer, Mathew Staver, said federal law can recognize the order, but cannot force Virginia to enforce it. Staver, dean of the law school at the conservative Christian-centered Liberty University, also said an amendment to the Virginia Constitution that took effect in 2007 bars same-sex marriage and enforcement of same-sex civil unions – an issue he said Miller’s litigation hadn’t previously introduced. 

 

Virginia and Vermont courts have ruled in Jenkins’ favor numerous times since she started fighting for visitation rights upon the dissolution of the civil union she and Miller obtained in Vermont in 2000. The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear Miller’s appeals. 

 

Jenkins’ lawyer, Rebecca K. Glenberg of the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, said that the appeal “has nothing new” and Miller can’t introduce Virginia’s marriage amendment now after failing to do so previously. She also said that previous court rulings have determined that under federal law, Virginia courts must enforce the Vermont court’s orders in this case. 

 

The Virginia Supreme Court ruled in June that a federal law aimed at preventing parents from crossing state lines to evade custody rulings requires Virginia courts to enforce Vermont’s order. The Vermont Supreme Court also ruled in Jenkins’ favor in 2006. 

 

The Virginia Court of Appeals ruled twice for Jenkins: Miller’s lawyers missed a deadline for appealing the first ruling, so they filed a second appeal on different grounds. The appellate court determined that the latter case failed to raise new issues, and the Virginia Supreme Court, the state’s highest court, agreed. 

 

In January, a Vermont judge denied Miller’s latest attempt in that state to deny visitation rights to Jenkins. Family Court Judge William Cohen also said Miller risked losing custody of her daughter if she continues to violate court orders. Cohen also rejected Jenkins’ effort to get primary custody of Isabella, but ordered that she get five-weeks’ custody in the summer. 

 

Miller gave birth to Isabella in April 2002, but later renounced homosexuality and moved back to the Winchester area with the child after the couple split. National gay-rights and conservative Christian groups continue to monitor the protracted legal battle.

Randy Wright wants to take your free speech away

I think it time for this douchebag to hit the road. Just another asshole in public that want to take people rights aways, must be a damn GOP member. His bio is here. He must love to waste tax payers money as well.

---

NORFOLK

It's doubtful that rapper Raymond "Boots" Riley will ever be invited to perform again at Town Point Park, but if he is, he can curse to his heart's content.

The City Council voted 7-1 on Tuesday to revise an ordinance that made cursing in public a crime. A nearly identical statute in Virginia Beach was ruled unconstitutional nearly two decades ago by the Virginia Court of Appeals.

Riley, a California rapper, was charged with a misdemeanor for using the F-word at a concert at the Bayou Boogaloo and Cajun Food Festival in late June.

Fraim, who is an attorney, said he doubted the constitutionality of the charge when he learned of it and asked City Attorney Bernard A. Pishko to investigate.

He did, and shortly thereafter, charges against Riley were dropped.

Officials said that the charges were dropped mostly because Riley's cursing did not involve "fighting words," meant to incite violence.

Tuesday's ordinance removed a provision from a statute that makes it a crime "to profanely curse or swear" in public.

That didn't please all council members. Don Williams voted for the ordinance, he said, with much reluctance.

W. Randy Wright voted no, saying the city should have challenged the court ruling.

"Nobody should have to listen to that kind of language," he said. "There should be a ban on profanity. They're saying the courts struck it down. Well, we should challenge that. We should take a stand on this issue."

proof that cops lie to protect their sorry asses.

kid found with a broken back, yet the cops who found him want you to believe he was fighting them and trying to get into traffic.. proof that cops only want to be cops to hurt and kill people legally...

So, having a broken back, semi to unconscious Incoherent. UNABLE TO MOVE. is now considered non compliance? They stood over him screaming "GET UP" and he probably mumbled "dont shoot, call the cops" So they tasered him 19 times.

Florida Cops Deny Responsibility in Death of Pot “Criminal”

another reason why you should never trust a police officer...see the video below

---

Police are obsessed with protecting themselves (while claiming to be laying down their lives for the rest of us — right)

Brother of woman who died in jail sues Chesapeake sheriff, others

By Kristin Davis
The Virginian-Pilot
© July 21, 2008

The brother of a woman who died two years ago after suffering a heart attack in the city jail has filed a federal lawsuit against the Chesapeake sheriff and other unknown parties.

The suit, filed July 16, claims wrongful death, medical malpractice and negligence in the death of Sotina L. Cuffee, who was serving eight months for a violation of probation for welfare fraud.

In addition to Sheriff John R. Newhart, other defendants of the suit include unknown sheriff deputies, physicians, physician’s assistants, health care providers and other jail employees.

The lawsuit seeks a total of $11 million.

---

Unless things have change alot in Chesapeake Jail, the women have only five to 8 cell blocks in the old section, where the so-call guards/officer do a walk through every hour or so, some times once or twice a shift after serving meals.

OT: Woman dies in jail due infection

I found this at BadCops News, which you can visit by clicking here.

Here is what is so shocking to me:

Tarrant County Jail officials say they’re not in charge inmates’ medical care.

“It makes us feel bad,” said Tarrant County Sheriff Terry Grishom. “We’re getting blamed that a jailer didn’t dispense medication, but jailers never dispense medication whatsoever.”

I'm sure they had some one who does this for them. They like most jail have a outside medical service contact, however its still for the Officers to make sure everyone is ok at all times.

Since Officials of the jail does not allow the inmate to have their meds with them then they are responsible for the medical care of those inmates that need medicines. I can only hope this lady's family sues the hell out of that jail and all officers and medical staff there.

Now I know from first hands that the Officers in Chesapeake jail doesn't handled mes anymore since they built the new jail, they have an outside medical services, which are no better. In my case I know this for a fact that the nurse they have need more training.

Once you are booked and if you are not bail out, and you have to stay in jail, well you will be seen by one of these low paid assholes. They will take blood to check for communicable diseases (they also check you dna without you knowing it), then you get a TB skin test. In my case I was expose to TB when I was 9, very long time ago. Once you have a p+ skin test you should never have another skin test(most dr's and nurse will tell you this), you will need to have a chest X-ray. When I told the nurse that I couldn't have the skin test that I would need the x-ray, however in her so call wisdom she told me the skin test would do. This test is to be read two days later, well in my case, within four hours I had a nice fifty cent piece bump on my arm. In my case the damn nurse just didn't listern, however it was policy, you see the skin test is cheaper then an x-ray. Which in three days the medical unit had to give me the x-ray anyway, so where did they save money, nowhere.

FAI case in Chesapeake

CHESAPEAKE, VA. (WAVY.com) -- The man accused of bilking thousands of dollars from consumers is now representing himself in court.

Court papers from Financing Alternatives George Christian are handwritten and he now claims he's disabled, but doesn't say what the disability is.

He also tells the court he doesn't have enough information to answer many of the state's allegations because he doesn't have enough information to confirm or deny allegations against him because he wasn't running the shop.

Christian also wants the court to remove from the state's complaint that consumers would pay FAI three times the cost they would pay if they purchased the computer directly from the manufacturer.

---

Yet I don't see the state going after RAC, BEST WAY, RENT America, Aaron's or any other rental company. if you rent to own anything from them you will pay 3 to 4 times as well, let they are not charge with fraud. Then again shouldn't the consumers also blame for this. Really, everyone knows you can rent to own computer from this rental companies, atleast with these companies you get free repair services while paying.

I just love the way the DA pick and chose who they go after. So why doesn't State goes after these companies, you get a computer from one of these companies @ 49.99 per week for 18 to 24 months, which equals to $3599 to $5199, yet if you buys the same computer from the companies or Wal-mart, any office supplies store from $599 to $1300, for the same basic computer you will get from these rental companies, yet no state DA is going after them.

Consumers for the most part of just STUPID, at least when you rent from a rental company the day you pay your first payment you get the item.

Suit greenlighted by appeal wraps up with settlement

Ryan Taboada and his family checked into a Roanoke hotel on March 27, 2003. When he went outside to get his luggage, a man shot him eight times and stole his van with his 3-year-old daughter still inside.

This week, a Roanoke judge signed an order dismissing the $3 million lawsuit Taboada filed against the owners of Holiday Inn Express on Gainsboro Road, saying the two sides "have compromised and settled their differences."

In between came a decision by the Supreme Court of Virginia that changed the law governing the obligations of innkeepers to their guests.

Alan Gnapp, lawyer for Daly Seven Inc., the company that owns the hotel, declined to comment about the settlement, as did Taboada's lawyer, S.D. Roberts "Rabbit" Moore.

But Richard Samet, a Richmond defense lawyer who has written a legal article on the Taboada case, said the state supreme court decision so broadened the liability of innkeepers that "I don't see how it could not have had an effect on the mediation and settlement of the case."

Virginia Beach lawyer and legal expert Steven Emmert suggested that the high court's precedent-setting decision could have been influenced by the egregiousness of what happened to Taboada. "It was a horrifying situation," he said.

A Florida businessman, Taboada and his family were in town visiting a cousin. When Derrick W. Smith sprayed him with gunfire, it left him temporarily paralyzed, with two collapsed lungs. His daughter was rescued minutes later unharmed after Smith wrecked while being chased by police.

In his lawsuit against the hotel, filed before Smith received a 76-year prison sentence, Taboada accused Daly Seven of cutting back on security at the hotel despite knowing that it operated in a high-crime area and that guests could be in danger of assault.

Daly Seven argued that the company couldn't be held liable because there was no way for the hotel to know Taboada was going to be attacked, and Roanoke Circuit Court Judge Clifford Weckstein agreed.

Taboada appealed, and in 2006 the Virginia Supreme Court unanimously overturned Weckstein's decision, saying Taboada's lawsuit could go forward. The justices ruled that an innkeeper has a duty to protect the safety of guests akin to that of trains and airplanes toward their passengers, and that Daly Seven should have known Taboada could be in danger because of the number of crimes and incidents that had already taken place on the property.

---

The Judges in VA are running amuck, I tell you these fucking judges are only looking after themselves. That is why we need to judicial reform in VA. All Judges should be elected, not appointed by their friends in the Legislator. What will be and who will be next to be abuse by these fucking assholes.