Prospective Members of our Presiding Panel:

Some of the world's most prominent government whistleblowers and human rights activists will gather during the week of May 11-18, 2008 in Washington, D. C. to lobby Congress and alert the public to the need to support whistleblower protection. Part of this momentous occasion will be a historical, Citizens' Forum On Judicial Accountability.

• The Honorable John Conyers, Jr., Chairman – House Judiciary Committee;
  
• The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, U.S. Congressman;
  
• The Honorable Ron Paul, U.S. Congressman;
  
• Barbara J. Rothstein* - Director, Federal Judicial Center;
  
• The Honorable Sarah Evans Barker* – President, Federal Judges Association;
  
• The Honorable Eileen Olds – President, American Judges Association;
  
• James C. Duff* – Director, Administrative Office of the U. S. Courts;
  
• Mary Campbell McQueen – President and CEO, National Center for State Courts;
  
• Attorney Jack D. Locrridge – Exec. Director, The Federal Bar Association;
  
• Janet Jackson* – Director, American Bar Association;
  
• The Honorable Edwin Meese III – Distinguished Fellow, The Heritage Foundation;
  
• Attorney John Crump – Exec. Director, National Bar Association;
  
• Attorney Heidi Boghosian – Exec. Director, National Lawyers Guild;
  
• Attorney Dominic Gentile* - Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada , 501 U.S. 1030 (1991);
  
• Marcel Reid – President, D. C. ACORN;
  
• Professor Carl Bogus* – Author, “Culture of Quiescence”;
  
• F. Lee Bailey;
  
• Attorney Michael Tigar* – Attorney for former attorney Lynne F. Stewart;
  
• Matthew Fogg, National President – CARCLE;
  
• Representative(s) of:
  
• i. No FEAR Coalition*
  
• ii. Government Accountability Project
  
• iii. National Whistleblower Center
  
• iv. Make It Safe Coalition;
  
• Cynthia Gray, Director* – Center for Judicial Ethics, American Judicature Society;
  
• Bill Buzenberg* – Exec. Director, Center for Public Integrity
  
• Judge Andrew P. Napolitano – Author, “Constitutional Chaos” and “The Constitution in Exile”;
  
• PBS Anchor Bill Moyers;
  
• Attorney Beth Slavet – former Chair, U.S. Merit System Protection Board
  
• New York Time’s columnist Adam Liptak;
  
• Leticia Linn, Journalist – Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression;
  
• Nancy Boswell, President and CEO – Transparency International USA;
  
• Johannes F. Linn, Senior Fellow* – Brookings Institution and Exec. Director of the Wolfensohn Center for Development;
  
• Larry Cox, Exec. Director – Amnesty International USA;
  
• Jim Turner, Exec. Director – HALT (Help Abolish Legal Tyranny)
  
• John J Oliver, Jr. – CEO and Publisher, Washington Afro;
  
• Attorney Michael Brown – Fox News Political Commentator

---

Another Panel, where I'm sure she doesn't need nor deserve to be on.

Juge Enjoying her Meeting

New AJA president Judge Eileen Olds (Virginia), with (l. to r.) Judge Michael Cicconetti (AJA past president, Ohio); Judge Michael McAdam (AJA past president, Kansas); and Judge Larry Allen (AJA Board of Governors, District 9, Ohio).

AJA Meets in the Great Northwest,

While at this meeting she had to take off, closing her courtroom from Tuesday the 25th thru 28th, so she could basic take a so-called business vacation. Then means for four to five days fathers and mother had to wait for her to get back to decide there visitation and child custody cases. Since we all know it more important for her to live up to her new title as AJA President.

she will have more of these so called business vacations coming up in Amelia Island, Florida May 1 - 3 and in Maui, Hawaii September 7 - 12. they are listed as Educational Seminars, yet they are held in some very nice vacation spots.

It would seem that Judge Olds was quote in the Race Gap, Discrimination in court cases.

her quote

Addressing the problem at the different stages of the criminal proceedings is daunting, said Eileen A. Olds, a judge in juvenile and domestic relations court in Chesapeake, Va., who is black and is president of the American Judges Association.

“There are so many levels within the process,” Judge Olds said. “You start with the police and what they are charging, and you get the magistrate, and who gets bail and who doesn’t, who gets the lawyer and who doesn’t.”

Here is a very interesting quote from the same story.

Judges are reluctant to change their handling of any specific case unless a defendant can show intentional discrimination, which is a tall order, Ms. Davis said. But for a darker-skinned person who may get a harsher sentence, the fact that bias was involuntary is small consolation, she said. “The fact that it’s unconscious doesn’t make the outcome any less difficult, or any more just.”

by that quote it would seem she is telling that if you are black you will get more time and harsher sentence then whites.

I guess things like is what these judges talk about at this so-called Educational Seminars. I'm sure they talk about how to make more money as well. We know that Judge Olds favor money over biology and that if you are a female rapist of young boys you can get a PR Bond in her court. So you can be back out there on the street sexually abuse more boys.

On Judicial Security

Eileen A. Olds, District Court Judge, Virginia, and AJA Secretary

Just after I had signed onto my computer to prepare the minutes of our recent midyear meeting, I was reminded again of how security concerns continue to plague judges and justices across this country.

"You are a lousy judge, and you should be removed from the bench" appeared as an instant message on my computer monitor from someone screen-named "Sinkiss." All kinds of thoughts crossed my mind: Isn't it 8:56 p.m. on a Thursday night? Am I not signed onto my home personal computer? Why is there a litigant even thinking about me at this hour? Isn't it a shame that personal information regarding judges is up for grabs to almost anyone without permission or scrutiny?

If you did your job fairly and just, then you shouldn't have thing to worryg about. Someone calling you a lousy judge is not a death threat it's a damn statement! A litigant could have been think about your sorry ass on that day, at the time for some other reason, maybe a child birthday, which he can't spend with his child due to your unending bais against fathers. Talking about that so called personal information about judges then I would suggest that you don't post your personal information the website. Yes the web, ie, your sorority web pages that list your name and email address. State sites that list your official email address on their website.. Virginia Pilot that wrote about your appointment to the bench, and other items dealing with you. Public groups where you were, are going to a public speaker at.

When individuals began prying into information that is not generally for public dissemination, or that we have not made available to them, it raises suspicion and should not be ignored. Until now, "Sinkiss" had never contacted me personally. I have known of his existence for approximately two months, as he maintains a "Blogspot" (a personal diary that he chronicles on the Internet) titled "My Fight in Family Court Chesapeake Virginia" dedicated to describing his experiences within the court system. He does not know that I am aware of this.

So was this the reason you finially took your sorry ass off my case. You stated the reason was you had third party info about this case. Please you had information giving to you many time from a third party that you even stated to the fact that you have receive said info in court many time. You never took you ass off then.

Had this been in years past, I may not have given it much thought. Incidents such as the recent Atlanta courthouse murders and the Chicago federal judge's slain family, however, remind me that what at first glance may look like an innocent or curious act can actually end with tragic results. I am concerned about these types of encroachments into our personal lives. We all should be. We should not have to juggle safety concerns and bear the awesome responsibilities and duties of our positions while at work, in addition to dodging threats to our personal safety in our homes. That is why the AJA president Gayle Nachtigal should be applauded for publicly responding immediately after those recent horrifying events. She should also be commended for actively participating in the National Center for State Courts' summit on court security held thereafter. It is not just within the confines of our courtrooms that we must be vigilant with security issues. That, and other issues confronting the judiciary, is also why our coming together for AJA annual and midyear meetings has taken on greater significance. It is important now more than ever that judges have a forum for addressing concerns that are distinctive to them. The American Judges Association is no longer just an organization that caters to judicial education and camaraderie; it serves as the advocate and the outlet that all judges need.

Face it you know you shouldn't be on the bench at all in family court, since you have shown that you don't fully pay attention to the case infront of you, for this reason is why JDR courts are not courts of records. So in them you can hide your illegal actions and your bias against fathers. You sanction baby selling and give a Female rapist of a 14 yo a P.R Bond. Where if it was a man you would have order a higher bond it not just right out jail til trial.